Aaron Edlin and Carl Shapiro, along with Scott Hemphill and Herbert Hovenkamp, published an article entitled “Actavis and Error Costs: A Reply to Critics,” which appeared in the October 2014 issue of The Antitrust Source. In the article, the authors defend their previously published analysis of the Actavis decision and argue that their proposed framework is supported by both the Supreme Court’s decision and economic theory. To read the article, click the link below.
Dr. Svend Albæk joins CRA's Antitrust & Competition Economics Practice
CRA is pleased to announce the addition of Dr. Svend Albæk to our Antitrust & Competition Practice as a Senior Consultant in Europe. “I am very pleased to...