CRA experts were retained to analyze a portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. The CRA experts successfully rebutted the plaintiff’s claim that the risk and expected performance of the subject portfolio had been misrepresented. The experts further demonstrated that the defendant’s statements about the portfolio were consistent with those of other market participants. The defendant prevailed at trial.
Looking ahead to 2026: Trends and expectations for International Arbitration
Across both investor-state and commercial cases, quantum debates have recently turned on attribution under concurrent shocks, the interaction of contract terms...