The Supreme Court has a love affair with the dictionary. Half of its decisions in the 2018 term cited a dictionary, often as the primary or exclusive means of defining a term in the statute. The Court’s obsession with dictionaries as the arbiter of statutory meaning is a recent phenomenon. A review of cases from 50 or 100 years ago reveals no such focus. The Court’s increased use of dictionaries may stem from the idea – very much in vogue today in some quarters – that courts are not to make law but simply “call balls and strikes.”
One of the truly remarkable phenomena in the history of both patent law and administrative law is the five-decade dispute between the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) vs. the Federal Circuit on the definition of “printed matter.” This article discusses the long-standing conflict between the Board and Federal Circuit. Is there a systemic problem in the USPTO’s legal apparatus? What corrective actions could be taken?
To read more about these topics and other recent publications concerning intellectual property issues around the world, click below to download a copy.
Four US Competition experts recognized as Global Elite Thought Leaders by Who's Who Legal
CRA is proud to announce that Andrew Dick, Elizabeth Bailey, Michelle Burtis, and Steven Salop have been recognized as Global Elite Thought Leaders in...