In a court litigation in the U.S., Dr. Tiago Duarte-Silva examined the data sustaining the plaintiff’s claim and showed that such data were unreliable. He also presented several arguments on why the damages claim was inflated, even if the data had been reliable. The court established that the plaintiff was only entitled to 7% of the total amount claimed. Dr. Duarte-Silva was supported in this matter by Dr. Swati Kanoria.
Who bore the tariff burden? Economics of IEEPA refund disputes
The refund question sits at the intersection of customs procedure, administrative law, but also economics, and resolution will likely vary significantly across...