In a court litigation in the U.S., Dr. Tiago Duarte-Silva examined the data sustaining the plaintiff’s claim and showed that such data were unreliable. He also presented several arguments on why the damages claim was inflated, even if the data had been reliable. The court established that the plaintiff was only entitled to 7% of the total amount claimed. Dr. Duarte-Silva was supported in this matter by Dr. Swati Kanoria.
Calculating damages in employee raiding or lift-out disputes
These are the key points addressed in the article: Damages in employee raiding cases may extend beyond lost profits. Courts often consider multiple categories...


