CRA provided testimony on behalf of plaintiff in litigation regarding a health plan’s use of MFN clauses with hospitals. CRA identified several mechanisms by which the MFN clauses were likely to reduce competition in this matter and demonstrated that they had historically harmed competitors. CRA also analyzed whether this harm to competition was offset by the procompetitive effects of MFN clauses.
Examining physician practice groups’ options to manage rising administrative and operational complexities
Charles River Associates (CRA) was commissioned by McKesson to analyze the economic role of McKesson’s Management Services Organizations (MSOs) within the...