In Kimble v. Marvel, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its oft-criticized holding in Brulotte v. Thys Co. that charging post-expiration patent royalties is per se misuse. In doing so, the Court distinguished between patent and antitrust precedent, holding that interpretations of the Patent Act enjoy a “superpowered form of stare decisis.” Joanna Tsai is a panelist during this webinar.
For more information on this event, click here.
CRA Competition economists contribute to article-by-article commentary on the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation
It gives the European Commission far-reaching powers to scrutinize financial contributions from non-EU governments to companies active in the EU, including in...