Aaron Edlin and Carl Shapiro, along with Scott Hemphill and Herbert Hovenkamp, published an article entitled “Actavis and Error Costs: A Reply to Critics,” which appeared in the October 2014 issue of The Antitrust Source. In the article, the authors defend their previously published analysis of the Actavis decision and argue that their proposed framework is supported by both the Supreme Court’s decision and economic theory. To read the article, click the link below.
The data-sharing paradox: Unintended consequences of mandated data-sharing policies
In response, recent EU measures such as the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the Data Act aim to level the playing field between platforms and their users by...