Aaron Edlin and Carl Shapiro, along with Scott Hemphill and Herbert Hovenkamp, published an article entitled “Actavis and Error Costs: A Reply to Critics,” which appeared in the October 2014 issue of The Antitrust Source. In the article, the authors defend their previously published analysis of the Actavis decision and argue that their proposed framework is supported by both the Supreme Court’s decision and economic theory. To read the article, click the link below.
CRA expands its Antitrust Practice with addition of M&A specialist and litigation expert
“I am pleased to welcome Hitesh back to CRA,” said Paul Maleh, President and Chief Executive Officer of Charles River Associates. “He specializes in antitrust...