In this article, Steve Salop reviews the formulation and evolution of the Philadelphia National Bank rebuttable presumption through the lens of economic decision theory, including the role played by advances in economic analysis. The article also sketches out the prospects for further evolution and suggests a number of non-market share structural factors that might form the basis of rebuttable evidentiary presumptions. To read the article, click the link below.
Antitrust in the Middle East: New competition laws, and time for more economics?
In the Middle East, competition law is being increasingly enforced and new laws introduced. However, little has been said about how, if at all the role...