In this article, Steve Salop reviews the formulation and evolution of the Philadelphia National Bank rebuttable presumption through the lens of economic decision theory, including the role played by advances in economic analysis. The article also sketches out the prospects for further evolution and suggests a number of non-market share structural factors that might form the basis of rebuttable evidentiary presumptions. To read the article, click the link below.
Lexology Index recognizes 44 CRA competition experts globally
This year, 44 CRA experts were named among the leading Competition Economists, with four recognized as Competition Future Leaders – Economists. This...