In this article, Steve Salop reviews the formulation and evolution of the Philadelphia National Bank rebuttable presumption through the lens of economic decision theory, including the role played by advances in economic analysis. The article also sketches out the prospects for further evolution and suggests a number of non-market share structural factors that might form the basis of rebuttable evidentiary presumptions. To read the article, click the link below.
A tale of two stakeholder groups in regulating healthcare AI
Despite significant spending on healthcare in the US, the industry is slow to adopt AI technology that can cut costs and improve efficiency. In this CPI...