Kim Schenk, John G. Plumpe | Intellectual Property
In this article, the authors analyze the Federal Circuit’s recent guidance in Ericsson v. D-Link on properly instructing the jury on entire market value rule and profit apportionment, comparing it with prior cases where the courts were faced with this issue, including the Supreme Court’s 1884 decision in Garretson v. Clark. To read more, click the link below.
Reprinted with permission from: Bright Ideas, Spring/Summer 2015, Vol. 24, No. 1, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207.
Biosimilars: Economic Issues for IP Litigation
In July 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted a determination of interchangeability to a biosimilar drug for the first time. This approval has...