*/
Kim Schenk, John G. Plumpe | Intellectual Property
In this article, the authors analyze the Federal Circuit’s recent guidance in Ericsson v. D-Link on properly instructing the jury on entire market value rule and profit apportionment, comparing it with prior cases where the courts were faced with this issue, including the Supreme Court’s 1884 decision in Garretson v. Clark. To read more, click the link below.
Reprinted with permission from: Bright Ideas, Spring/Summer 2015, Vol. 24, No. 1, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207.
12 CRA consultants named top IP professionals in the 2022 IAM Patent 1000
12 CRA consultants were recognized as leading patent professionals by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM). The IAM Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent...