This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
This article explores the implications of evolving standards for the type and quality of evidence required of economic experts presenting testimony on class certification motions in antitrust damages cases.
Vice President, Global Practice Leader of Antitrust and Competition Economics
Toronto
+1-416-413-4071 msanderson@crai.comIn this article, CRA’s Sean Durkin explains the economic incentives behind class definitions in antitrust cases and why those incentives can lead to classes...
Charles River Associates (CRA) was commissioned by McKesson to analyze the economic role of McKesson’s Management Services Organizations (MSOs) within the...
Fiona Scott Morton participates in the session titled “Double-Espresso Talk: Competition Policy Beyond the Headlines” discussing exciting developments in...
Fiona Scott Morton is a panelist during the Clifford Chance and Centre for Competition Policy in‑person panel discussion. Generative AI is poised to reshape...
