This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
This article explores the implications of evolving standards for the type and quality of evidence required of economic experts presenting testimony on class certification motions in antitrust damages cases.
Vice President, Global Practice Leader of Antitrust and Competition Economics
Toronto
+1-416-413-4071 msanderson@crai.comFTCWatch recently conducted an in-depth interview with Vice President Nate Goldstein, exploring his transition from a distinguished 23-year tenure at the...
Unlike strict capacity limits, fuzzy constraints allow firms to accept a portion of customers beyond a baseline capacity, which generates rejected customers...
Christian Michel teaches two sessions during the event on “Econometric methods to assess damages and their applications” and “Quantifying consumer harm:...
CRA is a proud sponsor of the event covering divisional patent strategies, denigration, Article 102, enforcement, mergers, distribution, as well as...
