CRA was retained by counsel to the claimant in an arbitration caused by defective equipment. The claimant had acquired purportedly more efficient equipment that is necessary for downstream processing of extracted lithium. Such equipment was defective, leading to lost profits and out-of-pocket costs beyond the acquisition price. After multiple expert reports, this dispute was settled on favorable terms.
Who bore the tariff burden? Economics of IEEPA refund disputes
The refund question sits at the intersection of customs procedure, administrative law, but also economics, and resolution will likely vary significantly across...