CRA was retained in an international arbitration between two Japanese affiliates of multinational pharmaceutical companies. The dispute concerned Respondent’s performance under a co-promotion agreement. CRA’s team of life sciences consultants assessed indicators of commercially reasonable efforts using various industry data sources. The CRA team also quantified Claimant’s loss resulting from the alleged inadequate performance under the agreement, and responded to Respondent’s expert regarding damages alleged by Respondent.
Interference with your mining contract: How can you protect your rights?
In an article published in The Northern Miner, Tiago Duarte-Silva and Volterra Fietta’s Ahmed Abdel-Hakam discuss the legal concept of tortious interference...