Counsel of an investment bank retained CRA in a stock-for-stock M&A transaction dispute. We investigated whether a forensic investigation or third party accounting review would have uncovered the buyer’s fraudulent activities. CRA’s report and deposition testimony contributed to the client’s successful defense against all claims.
Patients v. Hospitals: Why define markets at all if every market satisfies the SSNIP Test?
Hospital merger cases are won or lost on geographic market definition. The Third Circuit’s recent finding that it is appropriate to define geographic markets...