CRA was retained by counsel representing a leading global handset and smartphone manufacturer in an international arbitration related to valuation issues of balancing payments in a broad cross license with another global competitor. CRA provided analysis and rebuttal testimony to the tribunal regarding the non-SEP value contentions of the opposing party’s valuation expert.
The comparability challenges patent damages experts face
In August, in MLC Intellectual Property LLC v. Micron Technology Inc., the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling to...