CRA was retained by counsel for the Defendant, a US subsidiary of a multinational drink and brewing company, to assess the issue of monetary relief in connection with alleged false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(a). The accused campaign consisted of accused advertisements and packaging for an ingredients transparency initiative launched by the Defendant. CRA’s consultant quantified alternative measures of alleged Defendant’s profits and conducted a profit apportionment analysis.
Calculating damages in employee raiding or lift-out disputes
These are the key points addressed in the article: Damages in employee raiding cases may extend beyond lost profits. Courts often consider multiple categories...