In its 2014 Actavis v. FTC decision, the Supreme Court held that settlement of a Hatch-Waxman patent suit may violate antitrust law if the patent owner makes a “large, unexplained payment” to an alleged infringer. Even after more than four years, judges, lawyers, and drug companies still struggle with complicated evidentiary and economic questions raised by this landmark decision. Peter Rankin is a panelist during this seminar.
For more information on this event, click here.
An analysis of the effect of drug pricing provisions in the Build Back Better Act on pharmaceutical innovation
Charles River Associates has previously assessed the implications of proposals to implement international reference pricing in the US and found they would...