In its 2014 Actavis v. FTC decision, the Supreme Court held that settlement of a Hatch-Waxman patent suit may violate antitrust law if the patent owner makes a “large, unexplained payment” to an alleged infringer. Even after more than four years, judges, lawyers, and drug companies still struggle with complicated evidentiary and economic questions raised by this landmark decision. Peter Rankin is a panelist during this seminar.
For more information on this event, click here.
Speaking Engagement
BPLA Presents: Judge William Young and Antitrust Expert Panel: The Actavis Riddle
October 26, 2017
Mccarter & English LLP Boston Office
Key contacts
Upcoming events
Asembia’s AXS26 Summit
CRA is a proud supporter of the conference where attendees span the full spectrum of the pharmacy and healthcare ecosystem, bringing together key...
GAR Live: Life Sciences
CRA is a proud sponsor of the first-ever GAR Live: Life Sciences, evolving from the much-loved Technology Disputes event to reflect the growing complexity and...