Carl Shapiro and Aaron Edlin, along with Scott Hemphill and Herbert Hovenkamp, wrote an article about FTC v. Actavis, Inc. which appeared in the fall 2013 issue of Antitrust. The article identifies the essential features of the Supreme Court’s analysis and describes the elements of a plaintiff’s affirmative case, justifications that are ruled out by the Court’s logic, and a test for viable justifications. To read the article, click the link below.
CRA's Competition & Antitrust Practice commemorates Canada Day
Our Toronto team advises clients on complex antitrust, merger, and regulatory matters in Canada, Europe, and the United States. We would like to take this...