Carl Shapiro and Aaron Edlin, along with Scott Hemphill and Herbert Hovenkamp, wrote an article about FTC v. Actavis, Inc. which appeared in the fall 2013 issue of Antitrust. The article identifies the essential features of the Supreme Court’s analysis and describes the elements of a plaintiff’s affirmative case, justifications that are ruled out by the Court’s logic, and a test for viable justifications. To read the article, click the link below.
New research analyzes the impact of hazardous waste management on US economic growth
Improper management of hazardous waste can contaminate soil and drinking water, release toxic air pollutants, and create serious health risks for exposed...