Carl Shapiro and Aaron Edlin, along with Scott Hemphill and Herbert Hovenkamp, wrote an article about FTC v. Actavis, Inc. which appeared in the fall 2013 issue of Antitrust. The article identifies the essential features of the Supreme Court’s analysis and describes the elements of a plaintiff’s affirmative case, justifications that are ruled out by the Court’s logic, and a test for viable justifications. To read the article, click the link below.
Occupational dualism and intergenerational educational mobility in the rural economy: evidence from China and India
Yajing Jiang and her coauthors study the intergenerational educational mobility in developing economies. Using data sets that are free from the well-known...