Carl Shapiro and Aaron Edlin, along with Scott Hemphill and Herbert Hovenkamp, wrote an article about FTC v. Actavis, Inc. which appeared in the fall 2013 issue of Antitrust. The article identifies the essential features of the Supreme Court’s analysis and describes the elements of a plaintiff’s affirmative case, justifications that are ruled out by the Court’s logic, and a test for viable justifications. To read the article, click the link below.
Examining physician practice groups’ options to manage rising administrative and operational complexities
Charles River Associates (CRA) was commissioned by McKesson to analyze the economic role of McKesson’s Management Services Organizations (MSOs) within the...