Under the US Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis (2013), antitrust analysis of “reverse settlements” of IP litigations between makers of branded small molecule drugs and generics requires an analysis under the rule of reason. Are there distinct challenges presented by settlements between branded biologics and biosimilars? In a podcast episode of Our Curious Amalgam, titled “Biologically similar but competitively not so? Economic considerations of IP litigation settlements involving biosimilars” Sean Sheridan and Archan Ruparel speak with Anora Wang and Christina Ma on the complexities of negotiating patent settlements involving biosimilars. Listen to this episode to learn about pharmaceutical entry, price erosion, and more.
Podcasts
Biologically similar but competitively not so? Economic considerations of IP litigation settlements involving biosimilars
June 13, 2022
Key contacts
Upcoming events
Asembia’s AXS26 Summit
CRA is a proud supporter of the conference where attendees span the full spectrum of the pharmacy and healthcare ecosystem, bringing together key...
GAR Live: Life Sciences
CRA is a proud sponsor of the first-ever GAR Live: Life Sciences, evolving from the much-loved Technology Disputes event to reflect the growing complexity and...