When a rival accused Church & Dwight, manufacturer of Trojan condoms, of using shelf space agreements to maintain a monopoly, CRA was retained to address the competitive effects of the agreements. CRA’s economists filed expert reports analyzing the efficiencies and lack of any significant rival foreclosure arising from the disputed practices. CRA’s expert reports also included a sophisticated economic model illustrating why condom prices could fall even in the absence of efficiencies. All antitrust claims were dismissed.
What’s 340B? An economist’s view of the recent wave of 340B litigation
But this change has led to complex relationships among pharmaceutical manufacturers, hospitals, pharmacies, and third-party administrators, increasing...