In litigation before the Delaware Court of Chancery, a CRA expert was asked to address the basis for a company’s decision to terminate the development of a pharmaceutical product, avoiding the payment of development milestone fees. In considering the company’s actions, CRA’s expert analyzed the evolution over time of the company’s expectations regarding the value of continued development, as measured by expected net present value. Events had caused the expected net present value to decline to a level at which the company reasonably concluded that continued development was not practicable.
Looking ahead to 2026: Trends and expectations for International Arbitration
Across both investor-state and commercial cases, quantum debates have recently turned on attribution under concurrent shocks, the interaction of contract terms...


