CRA consultants assessed whether disputed representations of bioequivalence significantly affected sales of the branded product. The evaluation included consideration of distribution channels, purchase timing, and the effect of payor control mechanisms on product uptake and sales. The case ultimately resulted in a settlement.
Aggregate royalty for cellular SEPs in recent court decisions
This academic paper, “Aggregate Royalty for Cellular SEPs in Recent Court Decisions,” published in GRUR Patent by CRA Competition experts Nadia Soboleva and...