A CRA expert was retained by an ergonomic office supply company which had asserted U.S. patents it owns regarding adjustable desktop workplace platforms against a direct competitor. Mr. Duski evaluated the economic and technological comparability of license agreements, the existence and acceptability of potential non-infringing alternatives, and the Georgia-Pacific factors to determine the appropriate reasonable royalty rate that would have resulted from a hypothetical negotiation. Mr. Duski also provided rebuttal expert testimony related to the accused infringer’s claim of lost profits damages related to its asserted counterclaims of tortious interference. He issued three expert reports and sat for deposition.
IP Literature Watch: August 2025
We are pleased to present the latest edition of CRA’s IP Literature Watch. This issue contains pieces on antitrust & IP, licensing, litigation, innovation, law...