A CRA expert testified on the appropriate amount of a reasonable royalty to compensate for the US Department of Energy’s infringement of a pre-commercial, patented technology with the potential to generate significant energy savings in a broad range of materials processing applications. The CRA team analyzed economic considerations, comparable licenses, and the Georgia-Pacific factors to determine the proper structure and amount of a license in a hypothetical negotiation. The court rejected the plaintiff’s reasonable royalty claim and adopted the CRA expert’s conclusion regarding the likely outcome of a hypothetical license negotiation involving high risk, high potential, early-stage technology.
CRA recognized in Chambers 2026 for litigation support and crisis & risk management
Charles River Associates has been recognized in the 2026 Chambers Litigation Support and Crisis & Risk Management Guides, including a Band 1 global ranking...