Is the American military a mercenary army of the poor, as some critics of US foreign policy suggest? In this article, Andrea Asoni and co-authors Andrea Gilli, Mauro Gilli, and Tino Sanandaji analyse individual-level data of two national representative samples covering the period 1979–2008. The authors find that, in contrast to accepted wisdom, the US military no longer primarily recruits individuals from the most disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds. Technological, tactical, operational, and doctrinal changes have led to a change in the demand for personnel. As a result, on different metrics such as family income and family wealth as well as cognitive abilities, military personnel performs, on average, like or slightly better than the civilian population.
Journal of Strategic Studies
Assessing umbrella pricing incentives
When collusive agreements involve a subset of firms in an industry, they may create the incentive and ability for firms that are not participants in the cartel...