This article discusses the Appeals Court Panel’s decision to uphold the District Court’s ruling that the St. Luke’s-Saltzer acquisition was anticompetitive. The article focuses on the Panel’s views on efficiencies and also comments on its discussion of the implications for ancillary services.
ABA recognizes Economics Committee for innovative micro-economics video series
This award highlights the crucial role of innovation in enhancing member value within the ABA, showcasing the development of creative programs and content...