This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
This article discusses the Appeals Court Panel’s decision to uphold the District Court’s ruling that the St. Luke’s-Saltzer acquisition was anticompetitive. The article focuses on the Panel’s views on efficiencies and also comments on its discussion of the implications for ancillary services.
Philip Marsden discusses some of the ramifications of the UK Government’s approach to Digital Regulation, ahead of the Queen’s Speech this week. For more...
Among the pieces featured in this month’s IP Literature Watch are a paper on how technology transfer is used to influence product market behavior, market...
Debra Aron and Geoff Edwards present their co-authored paper titled “Lessons from the Experience of Telecommunications Regulation for Regulation in the EU...
Joshua Sherman speaks on the panel that will bring together regulators and experts in competition law and economics to discuss the recent energy decision in...
