This article discusses the Appeals Court Panel’s decision to uphold the District Court’s ruling that the St. Luke’s-Saltzer acquisition was anticompetitive. The article focuses on the Panel’s views on efficiencies and also comments on its discussion of the implications for ancillary services.
An economic interpretation of Rule 23(b)(3) for antitrust classes
In this article, CRA’s Sean Durkin explains the economic incentives behind class definitions in antitrust cases and why those incentives can lead to classes...