This article discusses the Appeals Court Panel’s decision to uphold the District Court’s ruling that the St. Luke’s-Saltzer acquisition was anticompetitive. The article focuses on the Panel’s views on efficiencies and also comments on its discussion of the implications for ancillary services.
CRA Competition's response to EU Draft Merger Guidelines: An economic perspective on the emerging framework
Our European Competition team has contributed to the economic assessment in nearly a third of distinct merger decisions cited in the draft, (46 out of 164)...