A manufacturer of a Schedule II product entered into sequential patent settlement agreements that included product supply obligations. Following allegations from its partners that the manufacturer was using the patent settlements to adversely affect competition, CRA’s analysis demonstrated that there was no anticompetitive effect and that the supply agreements enhanced efficiency and competition, particularly when considering the Drug Enforcement Agency’s quota system for active ingredient supply for Schedule II products.
Navigating private equity in health care amid regulatory scrutiny
She joined Leslie C. Overton from Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider LLP and Rebekah Goshorn Jurata of the American Investment Council to discuss the growing antitrust...