A manufacturer of a Schedule II product entered into sequential patent settlement agreements that included product supply obligations. Following allegations from its partners that the manufacturer was using the patent settlements to adversely affect competition, CRA’s analysis demonstrated that there was no anticompetitive effect and that the supply agreements enhanced efficiency and competition, particularly when considering the Drug Enforcement Agency’s quota system for active ingredient supply for Schedule II products.
Lexology Index recognizes 44 CRA competition experts globally
This year, 44 CRA experts were named among the leading Competition Economists, with four recognized as Competition Future Leaders – Economists. This...