CRA was retained to assess claims of misleading slack-filled packaging with respect to confectionery products on behalf of Defendant. Plaintiffs alleged that candy was intentionally placed in oversized packaging to mislead consumers into thinking that they would receive more product and were thus induced to make purchases and/or pay a higher price. CRA examined pricing and sales of the allegedly misleading products relative to other products and with respect to Plaintiffs’ allegations.
Life Sciences Litigation Insights: March 2022
Carl Washington et al. v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., Northern District of California, No. 4:15-vc-19-03504 On June 23, 2021 a federal jury in northern California...