CRA was retained to assess consumer claims that “Buy One Get One” or “Buy One Get Two” sales practices improperly induce consumer purchases with false and misleading product price information and false time-limits for nutritional products. In particular, CRA assessed Plaintiffs’ claim that such sales practices mislead consumers into believing that they are receiving an extra product as a “free gift.”
An economic approach could curb broad antitrust classes
On July 16, a federal court certified the “Cattle Plaintiffs Producer Class” in In Re Cattle and Beef Antitrust Litigation, a case alleging that Cargill, JBS,...